BSL-71 Disability Sport Wales

Senedd Cymru | Welsh Parliament

Bil Aelod Arfaethedig – Mark Isherwood AS | Proposed Member Bill - Mark Isherwood MS

Datblygu'r Bil Iaith Arwyddion Prydain (BSL) (Cymru) | Development of the British Sign Language (BSL) (Wales) Bill

Ymateb gan: Chwaraeon Anabledd Cymru | Evidence from: Disability Sport Wales

The need for legislation

The British Sign Language Act 2022 requires the UK Government to issue guidance about the promotion and facilitation of the use of British Sign Language (BSL). This however only applies in England and not to the Welsh Government or public bodies in Wales such as councils or the NHS.  The British Sign Language (BSL) (Wales) Bill aims to place equivalent specific duties on the Welsh Government and public bodies in Wales.

Question 1: Do you think there is a need for this legislation? Please provide reasons for your answer.

Yes, we do think there is a need for this legislation. Implementing the BSL Bill will ensure consistency across all areas of government, public bodies and policy areas.

Question 2: Do you agree or disagree with the goals that the Bill seeks to achieve? Please provide reasons for your answer.

Yes, we do agree with the goals and aims that the Bill seeks to achieve. Of the main aims listed in the consultation document, we support them all but would advocate for the inclusion of Sport and Arts explicitly within the first aim (’Support the removal of barriers that currently exist for deaf people...’) to mirror the current public bodies and services that have to adhere to Welsh Language policies.

British Sign Language

Question 3: Do you agree that the Bill should include proposals to promote and facilitate the use of BSL and its tactile forms?

Yes

Question 4: Do you agree that the Bill should support the various Welsh regional dialects of BSL?

Don't know

Question 5: Do you think that the term ‘BSL users’ should be replaced with ‘BSL signers’, recognising that BSL is a language which includes both deaf and hearing signers? Please provide reasons for your answer.

Don't know.

As an organisation, Disability Sport Wales would support community-led, positive and social model driven language (whether that is identified as BSL user or BSL signer).

Question 6: Do you think that the term ‘deaf BSL signers’ can be used when referring to BSL users/signers who are medically or audiologically deaf?  Please provide reasons for your answer.

Don't know.

The response to Question 5 can be applied to this question.

Deaf Communities

Question 7: Do you agree or disagree that deaf communities:

a) currently have a voice in the design and delivery of the public services that they use? Please tick the answer that most applies and provide any comments.

Strongly disagree.

We strongly disagree that deaf communities currently have a significant enough voice in designing public services.

b) should have a formalised voice in the design and delivery of the public services that they use, especially ones targeted at deaf people. Please tick the answer that most applies and provide any comments.

Strongly agree

Yes we agree that deaf communities should have a mandated voice and input in the design and delivery of the public services.

Question 8: Are there any specific communication methods used by deaf people that you would like the Bill to reference/include?

Primary: British Sign Language

Secondary: Sign Supported English (mixture of BSL and English and helpful for those learning BSL as their second language) and deafblind tactile signing.

Barriers that exist for deaf people

Question 9: What do you believe are the main barriers that currently exist for deaf people and/or their families in the following areas. Please tick all that apply and provide information/examples on each area:

Education; Health; Social Care; Transport; Other Public Services used by deaf people and their families; Workplace.

We acknowledge that there are several significant barriers for deaf people and/or their families which need addressing. In the context of Disability Sport Wales, we have highlighted three areas that have substantial impact on sport and physical activity.

Education: Children that use BSL as their primary language may have their sport, physical activity and physical competency impacted if there is insufficient access to BSL within a PE and extra-curricular sport context. This can then have a negative impact on future access to sport and physical activity.

Transport: There is an overreliance on auditory announcements within the transport sector which creates a significant barrier for D/deaf individuals, and they may miss important announcements (e.g.,  a platform change) which can impact the journey i.e., to a Disability Sport Wales event. By providing clear visual displays with both written plain English and BSL overlay to support the delivery of transport announcements would reduce the barriers faced by D/deaf people within the transport sector.

Workplace: Greater access to BSL support would remove barriers for Deaf coaches, deliverers and workforce who face barriers in the workplace which will subsequently encourage wider integration into workforces.

Establishing a BSL Commissioner for Wales

The Bill proposes to establish a BSL Commissioner who would promote and facilitate the use of BSL, and would have the same powers as other minority language Commissioners such as in the Welsh Language (Wales) Measure 2011.

Question 10: Do you agree or disagree with the proposal to establish a BSL Commissioner for Wales, and, do you have any different suggestions or alternatives? Please provide reasons for your answer.

Yes

Question 11: The proposed remit of the Commissioner would be to:

§    formulate BSL standards;

§    establish a BSL Advisory Panel;

§    produce reports every 5 years in BSL, Welsh and English on the position of BSL in that period;

§    provide guidance and a process for public bodies to promote and facilitate BSL in their respective domains;

§    establish a procedure for the investigation of complaints.

Do you agree with the proposed remit of the Commissioner, and are there any other provisions you would like to include in the Commissioner’s remit? Please provide reasons for your answer.

Yes we agree with the proposed remit of the Commissioner.

- We would like to see stronger language than ‘formulate’ standards (‘establish’ as an alternative).

- Produce reports a maximum of every 3 years rather than 5 years between reports.

- Identify a time-framed strategy/national plan and clear vision for BSL in Wales.

Question 12: Do you agree that the BSL Commissioner and the BSL Advisory Panel members should be fluent users/signers?

Yes

Question 13: Do you think that the proposed BSL Commissioner and Advisory Panel should prioritise the following. Please tick all that apply and provide reasons for your answer.

Enabling deaf users/signers to lead the development of policies and implementation of services for BSL users/signers; Early years language support for deaf children and their families; Improving BSL provision in education; Access to interpreters in public services.

We acknowledge that these are all key areas of work that need prioritising. Linking to the sport and physical activity context, a greater focus on BSL and early years language provision within education is needed.

Question 14: Do you agree or disagree with the proposal to place a duty on the Welsh Government to prepare and publish an annual BSL report? Please provide reasons for your answer.

Yes.

Yes, preparing and publishing an annual BSL report to hold themselves accountable.

Question 15: Are there any other issues that you would like to raise about the Bill and the accompanying Explanatory Memorandum?

No further issues than identified – but reference to Scottish Government and the work they have done to prioritise BSL in Scotland.  Welsh Government’s ambition should be at least as great for Wales.